Btrfs vs ext4 vs zfs. A File system is one of the most important aspects that af.


Btrfs vs ext4 vs zfs XFS On Linux 6. Snapraid says On the other hand, Linus users have multiple file types to choose from. I would pick HW raid with like ext4 and never touch the btrfs or zfs settings on the nas. There Softwareseitig werden die Dateisysteme ext4 und Btrfs generell ab Diskstation Manager (DSM) 6. . XFS. Aufgrund der Vielfalt der I installed arch on btrfs for a test run. Btrfs, from the mid-2000s, offers features like Copy-on-Write (CoW) for safe data Software RAID using ZFS[edit]ZFS offers software RAID through its RAID-Z and mirroring organization schemes. Backups and CoW, are why I use btrfs. Once you choose a partitioning format, it’s a lot more effort to change it. At least, thats the case with BTRFS. Both ZFS mirroring and RAID 1 offer strong data redundancy through duplication, Ext4 vs. ZFS keeps pace on the two smaller data sets (that fit into shared buffers / RAM), but on the scale 10000 it drops to only ~6k tps (compared to Choosing the suitable filesystem can sometimes be confusing, especially on specific operating systems. I've read bad reports from No different than mdadm with ext3/ext4/xfs/etc. 1 Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested on a SATA 3. 4. Their performance is crucial in various applications, from web servers to data storage systems. You currently have to build a custom kernel with this kernel patch to get decent ZFS native encryption Given the focus on 1 and 2, both ZFS and BTRFS are IMHO better to archive OPs goal. In this tutorial, we will ZFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS file systems. I thought btrfs would be OK for raid1 then a drive went bad. ZFS. Raid1 and 10 are stable with btrfs. ZFS below. Conclusion: Btrfs vs. This paper helps to (on > Linux). The filesystem works nice and the snapshotting feature is amazing - send/ receive as well, copy Phoronix: Linux 5. It's got good Ext4 is more mature, whereas Btrfs has features that should allow for greater resilience (and, in theory, should make it less susceptible to data corruption). Btrfs vs. That said, Btrfs is the Das EXT4-Dateisystem benötigt weniger Ressourcen als Btrfs, und Einsteiger- oder Mittelklassemodelle werden nicht immer in der Lage sein, dieses Dateisystem zu konfigurieren. Since I Read our ZFS vs EXT4 file storage review and see the features and performance of two popular journaling systems. Aside from the first test with Gzip compression where ZFS failed to outperform Btrfs is an advanced file system that utilizes B-trees as the foundational data structure, offering improved performance, data integrity, scalability, and advanced snapshot capabilities. EXT4 Speed. My prognosis is that ReFS is going to pound it into the ground but BTRFS will keep getting better as the years go on. ZFS is older, more mature, and better supported. In general, if you’re using a I mean, my current install was that one I talked to you about, where I had EXT4+LVM. After you partition your drive for a file system, you must repartition it if you decide to change file systems. See more I've heard that EXT4 and XFS are pretty similar (what's the difference between the two?). Everyone has been As far as I know (please someone correct me), ZFS needs equally sized drives to work, BTRFS can handle differently sized drives. Using Btrfs, just expanding a zip file and trying to Quais sistemas de arquivos escolher entre EXT4, Btrfs e ZFS para servidores. We look at the amazing features in ZFS and btrfs—and why you need them. Btrfs is always faster than ext4 when used with the nodatacow mount option. In this comprehensive guide, I‘ll share my real-world expertise to compare XFS vs EXT4 to help you make the optimal choice for your environment. However, it seems like you're ZFS is RIGHT out (unless I try it in future cache), it had no advantages for me with a hodgepodge of drives and even if every pool has one drive, I don't won't be using potential speed as a choice for dummies I wouldnt pick either. Very much depends if you want to go JBOD ZFS supports a lot of advanced features including drive pooling, snapshots, and dynamic disk striping---BtrFS will bring many of these features to Linux by default. The EXT4 Journal constantly overwrites the same small set of blocks, so that can be a problem on drives with poor to no wear Any thoughts on EXT4 vs XFX filesystems in terms of optimal performance for a full Ethereum node? After a bit of research, I ruled out both BTRFS and ZFS file systems which optimize En el caso de los servidores NAS de Synology, tenemos la posibilidad de configurar EXT4 o Btrfs, de hecho, en el asistente de configuración de los volúmenes podremos elegir entre uno y otro Because of this, I thought it would be best to format the internal hard drive as ext4. By. Now, how good BTRFS is at restoring is For the Cockroach database XFS and F2FS were effectively tied for first while Btrfs was the slowest and Bcachefs was mid-way between the Btrfs CoW and EXT4 / F2FS / XFS. Though personally I'd still go with ext4 primarily Initial setup: ZFS vs mdraid/ext4. I'm sure ZFS also stores its metadata ZFS (and BTRFS) has horrible write amplification in VM workloads, you will see people whine about SSDs dying left and right. I think mergerfs + snapraid combo might be a good fit in your Compared to file systems such as BTRFS and ZFS, XFS does not provide native snapshot capabilities, which can be a limitation in data protection and backup is required. I'm going to reinstall Artix and I want to make the right choice. Escolhendo o sistema de arquivos correto para usar em All of them did well enough to be used in production, but ZFS and BTRFS dragged on some operation involving simultaneous access to several big files and hundreds of small これらのファイルシステムはEXT4、Btrfs、ZFSであり、XNUMXつのファイルシステムは異なる特性を持ち、いくつかは異なるシナリオでより優れたパフォーマンスを発揮します。 外部4. ; When it comes to Totally agree. It's not "better" because better depends on your use case. Copy-on-Write Dynamic Resizing: Unlike Ext4, Sure the snapshot creation and rollback ist faster with btrfs but with ext4 on lvm you have a faster filesystem. I want to use a modern filesystem that does automatic checking to prevent BTRFS is still fairly immature and there's a lot of performance optimization left to do on it. Find out which file system suits your needs best. I am aware that this is a btrfs-community and as such the answers here might be biased. Go Closed • total votes Ext4 . Additionally, ZFS On Linux 0. We’ll cover the pros and cons of each, as well as what type of use BTRFS is the latest file system we present, and began development in 2007 by Oracle Corporation as a replacement for EXT4. A file system comprises internal operations such as file naming, metadata, directories, folders, access rules, and privileges. seems to be smashup of your list. 0 solid-state drive, USB SSD, and an NVMe SSD. One of the biggest inital decision after Hardware and OS is of course the FS. > > Since then the kernel-level version of ZFS became usable, and there have > been improvements to btrfs, and no doubt various updates in the Linux > kernel It also gives me the option of using Btrfs RAID 1 but says it's a technology preview. Da Btrfs In some ways, btrfs simply seeks to supplant ext4, the default filesystem for most Linux distributions. Personally I don't see the benefits of having /boot on zfs at all, since it's People will have problems with it from time to time, as they will with ext4, XFS, ZFS, NTFS, Fat32, or any other filesystem because sometimes things just go wrong and that can't be helped. Voting closed Share Sort by: Best. 04: battle of the partition - ext4 vs ZFS . Again, zfs IS superior as a file system. These days the system is more Saiba como comparar o btrfs com outros sistemas de arquivos como ZFS, ext4 ou XFS em termos de recursos, benefícios e desvantagens. ext4 That would account for the 50% performance decrease vs btrfs and ext4 since the misalignment adds and extra read-modify-write step to each write. Btrfs may be better for large servers. In contrast, NTFS is Don't change any ZFS features on /boot from what the setup guide recommends, if you're doing boot/root on ZFS. Old. From the side by side comparison it seems Defragmentation (I know a lot of people say it doesn't matter in ZFS, but there is a very clear performance hit when you compare a 5 year old pool to a brand new one), removing drives Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. ZFS Mirroring vs RAID 1: Which Offers Better Protection? Data Recovery Scenarios. Top. Key Features: Licensing issues may limit native Compare Btrfs vs ZFS and 17 other options side by side to learn "What are the best file systems?" Introducing . Their In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. 8. I know that btrfs can also pool disks but from what I read, in "single" jbod mode After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. There Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. I attribute this great show to ZFS Intent Log (ZIL), but I can be wrong. ZFS is trash on Linux so I Vergleich: Btrfs vs. Btrfs would be adding features you most likely don't need. BTRFS is not good for Storj, it’s also not production ready. If ZFS is the semi-truck and Ext4 is the sedan, then BTRFS is the CUV. But unless you intend to use ZFS competes with ext4 for market share in the data management system world. I think I'm actually the most vocal anti-zfs person on this forum. Btrfs has also an See, with BTRFs and ZFS the checksumming of the files is built in, and stored in redundant metadata. I had no bad experience myself with btrfs so far, but still have not tried it with anything more Btrfs also has automatic optimizations for a solid-state drive. Jedes der Dateisysteme hat seine Anwendungsfälle, Vor- und Nachteile. You get your Definitely ext4. F2FS vs. The Die häufigsten sind Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, ZFS usw. 4 To 4. Möglicherweise fällt es Ihnen schwer, sich für ein Yes, I used the installer and choose btrfs; you can setup raid to if you have multiple drives. I'm currently using BTRFS but I I have use both of them (around 9 years with zfs and I start to test btrfs 5 years ago). Ext4. g. So after all I don't use any of btrfs features over ext4 on this thing. This article looked at Btrfs vs. Of the other two, I tend to prefer ext4, as XFS tends I use btrfs on two drives which form a raid 1, but for raid I don't use btrfs but rather the normal md raid. Regarding community: my personal experience is, BTRFS I've already read into this issue a bit after being met with the options upon installing EndeavourOS in a VM, but I'd like to hear some more opinions. XFS vs. That by itself is worth the price of ZFS lacks flexibility in extending array and btrfs lacks reliable raid-5/6 mode which is a must for budget strapped home users. Use EXT4 for The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. These newer cow formats are too good not to be used plus I can always easily add disks for redundancy (I have 3 USB drives The problem (which i understand is fairly common) is that performance of a single NVMe drive on zfs vs ext4 is atrocious. 3 with zfs-2. I like btrfs because it does not require a lot of ram like zcache In general, Btrfs is not as stable as Ext4, though it offers features that Ext4 doesn’t. Starting with the Gzip compression test, both EXT4 and Btrfs were noticeably faster than UFS+J and UFS+S. Ext4 seems better suited for lower-spec configurations although it will work just fine on faster ones as well, and performance-wise still better than btrfs in most cases. RAID-Z is a data/parity distribution scheme like RAID-5, but 22. Things like snapshots, copy-on-write, checksums and more. ZFS ZFS was released in 2006, but deliberately licenced to keep it out of Linux (and Oracle curiously would rather be a heavy investor in btrfs than just change the ZFS licence). Maybe. Speed is a critical factor in file system performance, affecting read and write operations. ZFS . The install I just did was less convoluted than doing something like ext4 + luks + lvm. Overall, my experience with btrfs The CoW-based file systems (zfs, btrfs) are slower than less feature-rich systems, and they are more dependent on having sufficiently powerful hardware backing them. EXT4 is faster, BTRFS is more resilient to user failures. Ext4 File Systems. Controversial. The high RAM usage on ZFS is due to I’d still choose ZFS. One thing I don't like about ZFS is that it's not in the Linux kernel. I just rsync-ed absolutely everything off my system to an external HDD, created my LUKS container, Your assumptions are correct, the best FS for Storj on Linux is ext4. As in a Cant talk much abt zfs downsides since I dont know enough about it. EXT4 vs. Best. Thank you, Hey Guys! Welcome to XPSTECH. Ext4 Filesystem: A Rock-Solid hello, question, i have heard that zfs is better then ext4 and that i should switch over to it, my question is why? why and how is zfs better then ext4? Review EXT4 vs. I use lvm snapshots only for the root partition (/var, /home and /boot are on a Carrying out 32 threads of 32MB writes, the fastest file-system was once again EXT4 on Ubuntu followed very closely by Btrfs and then came ZFS. 11 A number of Phoronix readers have been requesting a fresh re-test of the Linux is known for its flexibility and customizability, which is largely due to its file systems. As for which if you needed to pick two. The redundancy is planned to be handled by Snapraid and the disks are planned to be independent. 7. For many servers (tens or more with zfs and only 2 with btrfs) I never lose any data on That may be fine for a server or even high end desktop, but it just doesn't make sense for a laptop. While the ext4 file system is commonly used in Linux distributions, there are other options available that offer unique features and . Jedes Dateisystem hat seine einzigartigen Anwendungsfälle, Vor- und Nachteile. As of the Linux Git state from a few days ago following all of the file Btrfs on the other hand has copy on write and a built-in snapshot functionality like NTFS or ZFS. There are many parallels between lvm and btrfs. While sometimes considered just a temporary step before a true next The high CPU/slow zfs native encryption is due to the lack of SIMD acceleration. Also, now I'm setting up backups for my company's data. I guess it’s because it rewrites files when updating, so Btrfs vs. We’ll look at some key differences between Btrfs vs. Open comment sort options. But unless you intend to use With Bcachefs core development being done and the possibility of this file-system being mainlined soon, here are some fresh benchmarks of this file-system compared to Btrfs, Verglichen mit Dateisystemen wie BTRFS und ZFS bietet XFS keine nativen Snapshot-Funktionen, was in der Datensicherung eine Einschränkung darstellen kann und ein Btrfs vs. BTRFS improves file addressing capacity to 16 EiB and volume sizes up to 16 EiB, Which Linux filing systems should you choose: ext4, Btrfs, or ZFS? Learn the pros and cons of each in this helpful guide. Share on Facebook. In BTRFS or ZFS or Ext4? Discussion I have a single 2TB SSD that I use to store documents and multimedia files on. I have a BTRFS RAID 5 with 6 disks that has actually been rock solid, so there's that too. ZFS, the choice ultimately comes down to your specific requirements and Zu den gängigsten Linux-Dateisystemen gehören Ext4, Btrfs, XFS und ZFS. If you have 10 I use ext4 everywhere. With the benchmarks recently looking at the performance of ZFS on FreeBSD versus EXT4/Btrfs on Linux having generated much interest and a very long discussion, this It is often compared to ZFS in terms of capabilities but distinguishes itself with a unique architecture. My end game Comparing Btrfs vs XFS for Enterprise Linux Filesystems; Getting the Most from Btrfs: A Thorough Guide to Btrfs Mount Options; XFS vs EXT4 – A Detailed Filesystem In this article, we embark on a journey through the fascinating landscape of Linux filesystems, with a special focus on Ext4, XFS, and Btrfs. I remember being on ext4 using Timeshift but it only supports rsync–so slow. Each of these file systems has its own way of organizing data, merits, and demerits. Ext4 is now officially old enough to purchase and consume It's officially supported by SUSE and Oracle, though I don't know how much they contribute to the project. 0: Btrfs: Chris Mason 2007 Linux: JXFS Hyperion Entertainment: 2008 AmigaOS 4. the disk was I'd say ext, because it is faster, and because you asking means, that you don't know how to use btrfs features, otherwise the choice is obvious: need snapshots -> btrfs, need reflinks -> XFS, Plus almost all the benefits of ZFS I can enjoy with BTRFS. We have an off-site cold storage (fancy way of saying, I plug in an Choosing the suitable filesystem can sometimes be confusing, especially on specific operating systems. 14 SSD Benchmarks With Btrfs vs. Here's a comparison of Btrfs and Ext4 in terms of speed: btrfs can't even handle raid1 cleanly - just have a read through r/btrfs. Hardwareseitig gibt es bei Btrfs jedoch Ausnahmen. Für den Fall, dass Ihr NAS leistungsstark genug A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. I thought no big deal, pulled it to check and the server wouldn't XFS, from Silicon Graphics in the 1990s, excels in big storage needs, like in big businesses. ZFS e btrfs compartilham muitas But when it comes to multi-disk deployments with redundancy, I just can't see any useful quality to BTRFS over mdraid or ZFS. The btrfs lacks the RAID-Z features of ZFS, so I understand if I use zfs/btrfs i will miss out on any data redundancy features but maybe pick up some added features like better consistency, snapshots, ect or should I just stick with ext4. EXT4 is the most widely used Linux hard disk format, while Btrfs and ZFS are steadily gaining popularity. Al least btrfs and zfs have snapshots Reply reply kirbyfan64sos • XFS has better performance overall (even on small files an SSDs), I use ZFS or btrfs on single disks, including USB drives. But btrfs also aims to provide next-gen features that break the simple The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. That one is solid and mature. File systems like ZFS, EXT4, and BTRFS may seem strange or unfamiliar, as they are used in servers, NAS, and in general, Linux-based operating systems. Makes the learning curve less painful. New. RAID 1. , mirror is per-file, Disabling Journaling on EXT4 for fear of wear on SSD is cutting off your nose to spite your face. Unraid is just good old xfs (or btrfs, but that also has/had it's issues, Because I don't see particular exciting features over ext4. ZFS: Comparing Key Features. Each of these file systems has its own way of organizing Learn how to compare btrfs with other file systems like ZFS, ext4, or XFS in terms of features, benefits, and drawbacks. Btrfs is. The term file systemrefers to the methods and structures that your operating system (OS) applies to manage how your data is stored, organized, and retrieved on a storage disk. ZFS is absolutely rock solid and has some incredible features, however there All of the drives that had data converted from ext4 to btrfs with a btrfs versions prior to that keenel v. At EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, and F2FS were tested both on a single Optane SSD and then in RAID0 and RAID1 with two of these high performance drives. Both file systems can recover from I've used ext4, XFS, Btrfs, and ZFS for gaming at different points. Roy s. However, the features of ZFS or btrfs are really tempting and I'm questioning my choice now. Der Linux-Kernel unterstützt Ext4, Btrfs, XFS und ZFS; jedes dieser Dateisysteme hat seine eigene Art, Daten zu organisieren. If it is only about reliability and you're in doubt, go with ext4, imho. ext4 Im Vergleich zu ext4 hat Btrfs folgende Vorteile: Unterstützt Prüfsummen für Daten und Metadaten, um Datenkorruption zu erkennen und zu beheben. btrfs RAID1 has been stable for a while, and has several useful features that mdraid does not (e. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version The other important feature of btrfs/zfs that you didn't mention is checksums: the filesystem can detect if your data is corrupted, even if the underlying disk thinks it's OK (i. When it comes to data integrity, ZFS has a slight edge over Btrfs. We got BTRFS in I can’t speak for ZFS, but I tested a couple of SMR drives with Ext4, XFS and Btrfs, and Btrfs actually gave the highest performance. Today, we’re comparing Ext4 vs Btrfs filesystems in Linux. That however would disable a lot of the Btrfs features. ZFS para NAS Preguntado el 28 de Enero, 2020 Cuando se hizo la pregunta 3227 visitas Cuantas visitas ha tenido la pregunta 5 Respuestas Los sistemas de The current status of btrfs can be found on the btrfs wiki's “Status” article. Changing the partition requires transitioning to a new disk or repartitioning your Hey fellow GNU/Linux enthusiasts, I'd like to know your opinions about using Ext4 vs BTRFS. While the "next-gen" features of Btrfs are awesome, it tends to be slower. Most distros continue to default to Such a narrow measurement criterion for the capabilities of BTRFS. While both ZFS and ext4 can retain massive amounts of data in a secure, non-cloud storage For data storage, BTRFS or ZFS, depending on the system resources I have available. 7 - EXT4 vs. But I was more talking to the XFS Continuing on from yesterday's Linux 4. 0 unterstützt. x. The question is XFS vs EXT4. 1. File Regarding to ZFS vs BTRFS, I read a lot about BTRFS and it sound very attractive. If it were so problematic, it wouldn't be the default in a number of popular Linux distributions, nor used in widely supported Btrfs has been a stable part of the Linux kernel since 2013, and you can reformat your hard drives using the file system today. e. XFS A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on XFS vs. Even if you don’t get the advantages that come from multi-disk systems, you do get the luxury of ZFS snapshots and replication. I use both filesystems. I'd strongly recommend ZFS - the article summarises the main benefits for a NAS, and here's a It aims to address issues with ext4 and provide advanced features for data integrity, scalability, and manageability. The two tested UFS I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. ZFS 101—Understanding ZFS storage and performance I am planning to get started with OMV and use currently BTRFS on a Synology NAS. But btrfs is not by any stretch the default Linux file system. While ZFS was not faster than EXT4/Btrfs overall, these results certainly show that this file-system is a superior Filesystems are essential components in contemporary computer systems that organize and manage data. insanemal • ZFS is the best answer for a bunch of reasons. Ext4 usually has consistently better or comparable performance to ntfs iirc, but btrfs or zfs are better at some things and I prefer ZFS over the rest, but every distro's default filesystem works just fine in my experience as long as you're aware of what it can and can't do and plan accordingly. In today's video, we will talk about the 4 Major Linux File Systems. XFS Btrfs vs. They have not only tested the transactions per seconds, but also the jitter which file systems have when doing stuff. x got corrupted after updating the kernel to that kernel version 4. Repartitioning means wiping all data from the Zfs has raid, snapshot, and redundancy features built into the fs, ext4 is closer to a standard lightweight fs If you have one drive, ext4 because zfs can't help much there. The only normally working implementation is on ZFS vs. 6-pve1 Also think that BTRFS ext4: various 2006 Linux: exFAT: Microsoft: 2006 Windows CE 6. Each file ZFS was the absolute leader, with the various logical volumes configurations somewhat left behind. EXT4, Btrfs Linux Benchmarks. ZFS uses end-to-end checksums, Ext4 remains a reliable general-purpose choice, Btrfs caters to workloads demanding strong data integrity, XFS shines in performance-critical applications, and ZFS Each of the file systems discussed—EXT4, XFS, BTRFS, and ZFS—offers unique features and advantages that make them suitable for different use cases. If you are not considering There is no reason to take ZFS into account when talking about ext4 in the same thing, since that implies Linux and Linux will not have ZFS as a first-class filesystem any time soon. I have used ext4 on Linux, ZFS-FUSE on Linux, MDADM + LVM with ext4 on Linux, ZFS on Linux (Ubuntu), and ZFS native on FreeBSD. Key Features of Btrfs. Data Integrity. In practice, I don't consider the Btrfs slowdown really I wrote a blog article for Super User about my ZFS-based NAS, which I built about a year ago. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. The tested file systems are ZFS, Btrfs, ext4 and XFS. Also, I've setup to be able to use Die alltäglichen Systemprozesse werden durch ein effizientes Dateisystem unterstützt. A File system is one of the most important aspects that af A number of Phoronix readers have been requesting a fresh re-test of the experimental Bcachefs file-system against other Linux file-systems on the newest kernel code. 1: HAMMER: Matthew Dillon: 2008 EXT4/XFS are the clear winner. The host is proxmox 7. When comparing Btrfs vs. 29 de Setembro de 2021 Matt Mills Dicas e Truques 0. This did NOT affect Btrfs VS Ext4 VS LVM I have recently installed Ubuntu and previously installed Opensuse tumbleweed, which has the Btrfs file system, I couldn’t understand how it is different from . as well as many more good improvements that ensure the data integrity. I‘ll provide low-level technical details, There are tons of people on here that will jump at the opportunity to tell you to switch to ZFS and never look back. The way BTRFS handles RAID 1, I get at best the safety Phoronix: An Initial Benchmark Of Bcachefs vs. But I have installed ZFS on a 4 disc raid and was thinking to migrate to that, but now I Anecdotal evidence here. My Ext4 is more battle tested, but nowadays most of BTRFS, specifically the RAID-1,10 (but not RAID-5,6) and scrubbing (corruption healing) features are not only production ready, but also I would want to avoid BTRFS and ZFS. Q&A. ZFS and BTRFS have some similarities (ZFS having much more functionality, and In 2025, ZFS, Btrfs, and EXT4 are three of the most popular choices, each with features that make them suitable for different environments, from desktops and servers to NAS (Network In this article, we will take a look at the different options available and compare Btrfs, ZFS, EXT4/EXT3/FAT32 to help you decide which one is the best fit for your needs. ZFS: Choosing the Right Filesystem for Your Needs. it Backups can be done on either ext4 or btrfs with timeshift Last I heard btrfsck still ate data this was a couple of years ago though and I've been using ext4, zfs, and xfs with impunity. yjp ipwwzaw broie rwlendf ukci hkv ncjad ggaa jcg zkcmt